The Pursuit of the Unknowable
Pardes Yehuda | June 24, 2026
Print This Article
View Original PDF

The Pursuit of the Unknowable

Pardes Yehuda | June 24, 2026

זֹאת חֻקַּת הַתּוֹרָה: (במדבר יט ב)

We are introduced to the commandment of the Parah Adumah, the Red Heifer. The Torah introduces this mitzvah with unique phrase: "זֹאת חֻקַּת הַתּוֹרָה" "This is the statute of the Torah." Chazal explain that a chok is a decree given without an explicit reason. The Yalkut Shimoni tells us that King Shlomo, the wisest man to ever live, set out to solve this mystery. Shlomo himself declares in Koheles: "אָמַרְתִּי אֶחְכָּמָה וְהִיא רְחוֹקָה מִמֶּנִּי" "I said I would grow wise, but it remains far from me." The Midrash says that King Shlomo understood the spiritual idea of almost every mitzvah, but whenever he reached the mitzvah of the Red Heifer, he would analyze, question, only to come up completely empty-handed. He simply could not grasp it.

But this Midrash raises a question: What was King Shlomo thinking? If Hashem openly declared that the Red Heifer is a chok, a secret decree, then any humanly reason is wrong. If Hashem says, "I am keeping this secret," Why would the wisest of all men spend his precious time and energy trying to find something that is definitely sealed? The Masas HaMelech, Hagaon Rav Shimon Moshe Diskin, offers a answer that opens up how we must view the mitzvah of learning the Mitzvohs of the Torah. To understand Shlomo's approach, imagine if the Torah took a logical mitzvah "If you borrow money from your neighbor, and stated it is a chok that you must pay him back," we would look at that verse and be deeply confused. We would say it makes perfect sense! If I take something that isn't mine, basic human morality and intellect demand that I return it!" If the Torah were to label a financial repayment as an "unknowable decree," our obligation in learning that Torah would be to intellectually dismantle our own logic. We would have to ask ourselves: "Why does the Torah reject human logic here? Why is my moral knowing insufficient? What element of this act overstep human intellect?" We would have to challenge every single rationalization until we reached a point where we realized that we don't return the money just because it makes sense to us, but because it is a divine decree. By exhausting our human logic to its limits and finding its boundaries, we would finally clarify the truth of the Torah's statement that it is, indeed, a chok. This, the Masas HaMelech explains, is exactly what King Shlomo was doing with the Red Heifer.

Shlomo never fell into the trap of arrogance. He knew that he could never find the "real" reason for the Parah Adumah, because Hashem said it didn't have a humanly accessible one. Shlomo wasn't trying to find the real reason. Instead, he was fulfilling his ultimate obligation of Torah study: He was testing every single possible human theory to prove that none of them were sufficient. He looked at the Red Heifer and asked: "Could it be a health measure? Could it be a symbolic representation of the Sin of the Golden Calf? Could it be an ancient environmental ritual? No, that doesn't fit the parameters." He researched, lectured, and investigated every single rationale the human mind could possibly manufacture to explain the Red Heifer. And one by one, using his intellect, he systematically proved that every single human explanation was flawed, incomplete, or incorrect. Only after he had exhausted every avenue of human thought, only after he had hit a dead end of every intellectual corridor, did he reach ultimate clarity. He looked at the vast landscape of human wisdom and realized it couldn't touch this mitzvah. And it was at that moment that he was finally able to declare with absolute clarity and conviction: "וְהִיא רְחוֹקָה מִמֶּנִּי"—"It is truly, completely, far from me." Shlomo didn't fail. His realization that it was beyond him was his success. He verified the truth of the Torah's definition of a chok by mapping the outer boundaries of human intellect.

This is a profound lesson here for us in our daily lives. We live in an information age where we believe everything can be understood through rationalism. When tragedy strikes, when life challenges us, or when we face divine calculations that seem unfair or confusing, our first instinct is to demand a rational explanation. We want to know why. King Shlomo teaches us the sanctity of boundaries. True wisdom is not about knowing everything; true wisdom is having the intellectual honesty to know where human logic ends and where Divine Provinence begins. We may ask the questions, to process our thoughts, to do the mental and emotional work, and then—with a full heart—to recognize that the ultimate answers belong to something much greater than ourselves. We must always maintain the humility to look up at the Heavens and say, "Ribono shel Olam, I have done my searching, and I am ready to trust in Your infinite wisdom."

זֹאת חֻקַּת הַתּוֹרָה: (במדבר יט ב)

We are introduced to the commandment of the Parah Adumah, the Red Heifer. The Torah introduces this mitzvah with unique phrase: "זֹאת חֻקַּת הַתּוֹרָה" "This is the statute of the Torah." Chazal explain that a chok is a decree given without an explicit reason. The Yalkut Shimoni tells us that King Shlomo, the wisest man to ever live, set out to solve this mystery. Shlomo himself declares in Koheles: "אָמַרְתִּי אֶחְכָּמָה וְהִיא רְחוֹקָה מִמֶּנִּי" "I said I would grow wise, but it remains far from me." The Midrash says that King Shlomo understood the spiritual idea of almost every mitzvah, but whenever he reached the mitzvah of the Red Heifer, he would analyze, question, only to come up completely empty-handed. He simply could not grasp it.

But this Midrash raises a question: What was King Shlomo thinking? If Hashem openly declared that the Red Heifer is a chok, a secret decree, then any humanly reason is wrong. If Hashem says, "I am keeping this secret," Why would the wisest of all men spend his precious time and energy trying to find something that is definitely sealed? The Masas HaMelech, Hagaon Rav Shimon Moshe Diskin, offers a answer that opens up how we must view the mitzvah of learning the Mitzvohs of the Torah. To understand Shlomo's approach, imagine if the Torah took a logical mitzvah "If you borrow money from your neighbor, and stated it is a chok that you must pay him back," we would look at that verse and be deeply confused. We would say it makes perfect sense! If I take something that isn't mine, basic human morality and intellect demand that I return it!" If the Torah were to label a financial repayment as an "unknowable decree," our obligation in learning that Torah would be to intellectually dismantle our own logic. We would have to ask ourselves: "Why does the Torah reject human logic here? Why is my moral knowing insufficient? What element of this act overstep human intellect?" We would have to challenge every single rationalization until we reached a point where we realized that we don't return the money just because it makes sense to us, but because it is a divine decree. By exhausting our human logic to its limits and finding its boundaries, we would finally clarify the truth of the Torah's statement that it is, indeed, a chok. This, the Masas HaMelech explains, is exactly what King Shlomo was doing with the Red Heifer.

Shlomo never fell into the trap of arrogance. He knew that he could never find the "real" reason for the Parah Adumah, because Hashem said it didn't have a humanly accessible one. Shlomo wasn't trying to find the real reason. Instead, he was fulfilling his ultimate obligation of Torah study: He was testing every single possible human theory to prove that none of them were sufficient. He looked at the Red Heifer and asked: "Could it be a health measure? Could it be a symbolic representation of the Sin of the Golden Calf? Could it be an ancient environmental ritual? No, that doesn't fit the parameters." He researched, lectured, and investigated every single rationale the human mind could possibly manufacture to explain the Red Heifer. And one by one, using his intellect, he systematically proved that every single human explanation was flawed, incomplete, or incorrect. Only after he had exhausted every avenue of human thought, only after he had hit a dead end of every intellectual corridor, did he reach ultimate clarity. He looked at the vast landscape of human wisdom and realized it couldn't touch this mitzvah. And it was at that moment that he was finally able to declare with absolute clarity and conviction: "וְהִיא רְחוֹקָה מִמֶּנִּי"—"It is truly, completely, far from me." Shlomo didn't fail. His realization that it was beyond him was his success. He verified the truth of the Torah's definition of a chok by mapping the outer boundaries of human intellect.

This is a profound lesson here for us in our daily lives. We live in an information age where we believe everything can be understood through rationalism. When tragedy strikes, when life challenges us, or when we face divine calculations that seem unfair or confusing, our first instinct is to demand a rational explanation. We want to know why. King Shlomo teaches us the sanctity of boundaries. True wisdom is not about knowing everything; true wisdom is having the intellectual honesty to know where human logic ends and where Divine Provinence begins. We may ask the questions, to process our thoughts, to do the mental and emotional work, and then—with a full heart—to recognize that the ultimate answers belong to something much greater than ourselves. We must always maintain the humility to look up at the Heavens and say, "Ribono shel Olam, I have done my searching, and I am ready to trust in Your infinite wisdom."

PDF Preview