This is consistent with that which has been explained in Chassidus regarding the rabbinical maxim: יָפָה שִיחָתָן שֶׁל עַבְדֵי אָבוֹת לִפְנֵי הַמָקוֹם מִתוֹרָתָן שֶׁל בָּנִים “Greater is the patriarch’s servant’s talk, than the teachings of the sons”, because the section in Torah which describes the story of Eliezer is repeated in the Torah, and many fundamental principles of Torah were only ever given over to us as an allusion in the Torah. This is because the section of Eliezer [which talks about the marriage of Yitzchok and Rivkah] is the alliance of the Divine name of ‘Ban’ together with the Divine name of ‘Mah’, which symbolises the unification of the written Torah with the Oral Torah. From a general perspective this is the alliance of the Divine name ‘Mah’ and the Divine name ‘Ban’, but it is also within every individual Mitzvah with the alliance and unification of that particular Mitzvah with that specific unification.
And so too is it with the red heifer, about which the Torah states: “זֹאת חֻקַת הַתוֹרָה - This is the statute of the Torah”, that as a result of the ashes and the live water the general unification of ‘Rotzoi’ and ‘Shov’ come about, which is the general principle of the Torah, and in every individual Mitzvah this is the specific unification.
