אלה שמות בני ישראל הבאים מצרימה
“And these are the names of Bnei Yisroel who were coming to Egypt”. (Shemos 1:1)
Sefer Shemos commences by mentioning the names of the tribal ancestors. Although they had previously been recorded during their lifetime, they are once again repeated after they have passed from the scene because of their dearness to Hashem. They are likened to the stars of the sky, which Hashem brings out and brings in by name. He counts and enumerates them at both opportunities. This indicates that the forefathers, like the stars, are precious to Hashem. Actually, Hashem took a census of Klal Yisroel three times: when they were liberated and left Mitzrayim; after the chet hoegel debacle during which a number died, to see how many had survived; and when He was about to rest His Shechinah among them. The meforshim (Rashi in Sefer Bamidbar, prior to the last count) explain the purpose of these censuses: to demonstrate His abiding love for them.
It is not as if Hashem requires a census. He certainly knows how many Jews comprise His nation; rather, He shows His affection by counting them. The Kli Yakar (Parshas Ki Sisa 30:11) supplements this: Ki sisa, es rosh Bnei Yisroel, “When you take a census of Bnei Yisroel,” whenever the concept of nesius rosh, elevating the head (counting), is used with regard to numbers, the purpose is to teach that by numbering/counting the people, they are (being) elevated above the nations of the world. Every number indicates the singular uniqueness of each individual Jew. In this manner, Hashem shows each Jew how important and valuable he is to Him.
Showing love to each talmid is a central theme in the world of Torah chinuch [education]. More significant, love demonstrates to the talmid that he is valued, appreciated and important. This applies in the classroom, in the beis hamedrash, and (especially) in the home. A child must feel loved. We sometimes see children whose parents certainly love them, yet they still do not thrive. The children who thrive are the ones who feel accepted and cherished for exactly who they are. A child who does not feel special will, unfortunately, act out in a manner that garners attention for himself. This is a response to rejection, a cry for affection.
When a talmid acts out, how his rebbe and parents respond can make the difference between the spiritual life and death of the student. The Chasam Sofer was zochah, merited, a Heavenly favor for which very few poskim qualified. His decisions and chiddushim, have been accepted throughout the spectrum of the Torah world. The Minchas Elazar, attributes the Chasam Sofer’s extraordinary merit to one specific incident that took place during his tenure as Rosh Yeshivah of the distinguished Pressburg Yeshivah.
The seder ha’limud, order of Torah learning, of the yeshivah, was to repeat the Mesechtos, which they studied, every three years. One brilliant bochur in the yeshivah, by the name of Landsberg, was able to repeat verbatim every word that the Chasam Sofer said in shiur. Not only could he repeat the Torah thoughts, but he even mimicked the nuances and expressions of their revered Rebbe. Prior to a shiur, which he had heard during the previous cycle of learning, he told the class that he would say the shiur with all of the accompanying nuances that were common fare for the Chasam Sofer.
The talmid did so prior to a shiur that the Chasam Sofer was about to teach. Thus, when the Chasam Sofer taught the shiur with exactly the same pattern that was presaged by Landsberg, it brought quiet chuckles to the faces of the other bochurim. When the Chasam Sofer noticed that something was amiss, he stopped the shiur and asked what was so funny. Obviously, no one was prepared to tattle on Landsberg, until finally a student, Aharon Deutsch, raised his hand and explained what had occurred. The Chasam Sofer’s reaction was to declare, “Landsberg has stolen my shiur!”
The bochurim trembled when they heard their revered Rebbe utter these words. Added to this was the announcement shortly thereafter that anyone who had attended yesterday’s shiur should appear the next day in the beis hamedrash. Any bochur who did not appear at the designated time would be dismissed from the yeshivah. Everyone was certain that the Chasam Sofer would excoriate Landsberg in the presence of the entire yeshivah for slighting the gadol hador, the pre-eminent Torah leader of the generation.
At the appointed time, the Chasam Sofer entered the beis hamedrash. All of the bochurim were present, their nerves taut, all of them waiting to hear the mussar shmuess that would remain etched in their minds forever. Three hundred and ninety bochurim sat on the edge of their seats, ready to hear the gadol hador’s piercing words. It did not happen. The Chasam Sofer said the following: “I do not know what happened yesterday, how I could have publicly offended a bochur who is so dear to me. He is a bochur who is steeped in Torah erudition; I should have realized that what he did was out of his extraordinary love of Torah.” Then the Chasam Sofer broke down in bitter, incessant weeping, “With a broken heart, I publicly ask his mechilah [forgiveness] and promise that I will never do it again.”
The bochurim sat there stunned. They did not believe what they had just heard. The Chasam Sofer had just asked forgiveness from the bochur who had the day before offended him! It was at this moment that the bochurim came to realize the unparalleled plateau of yiras Shomayim and extreme humility that the saintly Rebbe evinced. They had no doubt that the bochur who had acted impudently the day before should have received a scathing lecture. However, the Chasam Sofer sought to teach his bochurim, many of them who were destined to become Torah leaders themselves, an important lesson in Torah chinuch. Their education, and, by extension, the education of generations of bnei Torah took center stage and outweighed the excoriation of one bochur. We understand now why the Minchas Elazar felt that this action of the Chasam Sofer catalyzed the acceptance of his piskei halachah throughout Klal Yisroel.
Sensitivity to another person’s pain, acknowledging his adversity, is imperative for a Torah Jew. The Tiferes Shlomah posits that Moshe Rabbeinu achieved his position – and succeeded as the quintessential leader and Rebbe of Klal Yisroel – specifically because of his ability to feel the pain and carry the yoke with his brethren. We might think that this imperative applies only with regard to adults. The following vignette demonstrates that it applies equally to a young five-year-old girl. Furthermore, it is incumbent even on a Torah leader.
Rav Yechezkel Abramsky, zt”l, was walking home through the streets of Bayit V’gan one afternoon when he chanced upon a young five-year-old girl weeping profusely. He stopped, went over and asked the child what was troubling her. The girl was well aware (according to her elementary level of understanding) that Rav Abramsky was a holy man who commanded the respect of the members of her community. Amid her tears, she said that she had worn a new dress to school (she pointed to the dress that she was wearing) and her friend had said that it was not a very pretty dress. The distinguished Dayan bent down and said, “You go back and tell your friend that Rav Abramsky said that it is a pretty dress!”
Rav Abramsky’s aide, who was walking with him, suggested, “Surely, the Dayan has more important things to do with his time – like writing another novel Torah thought. It certainly takes precedence over a little girl’s dress!” Rav Abramsky replied, “When Moshiach arrives, he will wipe away all the tears that flow from the eyes of our people. All, means all the tears – even those of this young child. What is wrong if I want to follow in the footsteps of the Ribbono Shel Olam and wipe away the tears of a child?” This is a novel approach, but then, he was a unique gadol. (Peninim on the Torah)
Hope for the Future
וכאשר יענו אתו כן ירבה וכן יפרץ
“But the more they afflicted them, the more they multiplied and the more they grew”. (Shemos 1:12)
The pasuk describes a cause and effect; the increasing severity of the servitude was followed by a corresponding increase in the rate of birth. The Gemara (Sotah 11a), cited by Rashi, explains that the Egyptians wanted to decrease the Yidden’s numbers so they increased the workload (Sifsei Chachomim). Yet, Hashem decided to do the opposite. Thus, the more the Jews were afflicted, the more they increased.
According to the Ohr HaChaim on this pasuk, the additional children were to help the Jews with the extra work. Hashem responded to the greater and more difficult amount of work with a commensurate increase in children. By having more people at work, the load was lightened for them all.
