Congregation Simchas Hatefillah was having a collective Purim seudah. Raffle tickets were being sold at the door.
“I’m going to arrive late at the seudah,” Binyomin told Mordechai, “towards the very end. Could you please buy a raffle ticket for me?”
“Sure,” replied Mordechai. “I’m also planning to buy one.”
When Mordechai arrived, the gabbai asked: “Do you want to buy raffle tickets?”
“Yes, I’d like two,” Mordechai replied. “One for me and one for Binyomin, who will arrive later.”
Mordechai paid for the two tickets. The gabbai tore two numbers off the roll, 108 and 109.
After festive eating, drinking, singing and divrei Torah, the gabbai announced: “And now, we will hold the raffle draw! First prize is a silver goblet!”
The gabbai put his hand in the box containing the stubs. He pulled out a stub and announced: “First prize winner is number ... 109!”
Binyomin had just walked in. He hurried over to Mordechai and asked. “What number did you get for me?”
“I received numbers 108 and 109, but didn’t have in mind which was for me and which for you,” replied Mordechai. “Had you come it two minutes earlier, I would have already given you one of the tickets.”
“Either way, that’s great!” replied Binyomin. “One of us won first prize!”
“That’s true,” replied Mordechai. “The question is who?”
“Rabbi Dayan is sitting there,” said Binyomin. “We can ask him.”
The two went over to Rabbi Dayan. “We have a question,” Mordechai said.
“I’m very, very sorry,” apologized Rabbi Dayan effusively. “I’ve drunk several cups of wine, though, and can’t rule now. Ask me tomorrow.”
The next day, the two asked Rabbi Dayan. Mordechai asked: ‘Who is entitled to the prize?’
“When you buy a raffle for another, even with your own money, you acquire it for him as his agent,” replied Rabbi Dayan. “All the more so, if he asked you to lend him the money” (C.M. 183:4; Divrei Chaim C.M. 2:21)
“Even if you later claim that you intended to buy it for yourself, you are not believed if you did not indicate so before the transaction (ibid.)
“When you buy for yourself and another, you should initially decide which is for yourself and which is for him. Even a mental decision suffices for this, since you intend to acquire this specific ticket for him as his agent (Pischei Choshen, Pikadon 12:21[63]).
“If you bought two tickets without specific intention, and one turned out winning – if you still hold both tickets, you can retain the winning ticket for yourself. You do not have to share the prize with the other person, since – although you bought two tickets – there was no intent to be partners, but rather that one should be for you and one for the sender. You are in possession of the winning ticket, so that hamotzi meichaveiro alav hare’ayah – the burden of proof is on him (ibid.)
“Even if after buying the two tickets, you intend that a specific one should be for the other person, but did not yet give it to him, he might not acquire the ticket with your intent alone; you can still retain the winning ticket for yourself. It would be a middas chassidus (virtuous act), though, to honor your intent (Tur C.M 200:15; Pis’chei Choshen, Kinyanim 1:1).
“However, if you laid out the money, and when the other person paid, you agreed that a specific ticket should be his but didn’t hand it over, this likely constitutes at least kinyan kessef to invoke mi shepara (condemnation of one who retracts after payment) or possibly even bereirah (retroactive designation) to acquire it (Pischei Choshen, Pikadon, ibid.).
“Clearly, once you give a ticket to the other person,” concluded Rabbi Dayan, “he acquires it with any potential gain inherent in it.”
Verdict: Mordechai is entitled to the prize, since he didn’t designate which ticket was for Binyomin. Binyomin would be entitled to the prize if Mordechai intended at the time of purchase that this specific ticket is for him, or if he already handed it to him. Intent alone after purchase would be considered a middas chassidus to honor.
Based on writings of Harav Chaim Kohn, shlita
