creating a false impression in another person’s mind. The Gemara in Chullin (94a) cites Shmuel who says that this prohibition applies to Jew and Gentile, and the Baraisah there enumerates cases of forbidden deceptive conduct, such as repeatedly inviting someone to a meal knowing that he will refuse, solely to create a false impression of generosity. The insincere negotiator does something similar: he mimics the behaviors of a genuine counterpart – making proposals, exchanging concessions, and engaging in deliberation – all to create a false impression that he intends to reach a deal.
Notably, the Shaarei Teshuvah (3:181) states that the leniency of “Mutar L’Shanos Mipnei HaShalom” – that one may sometimes deviate from the truth for the sake of peace – does not apply to Geneivas Da’as. There is no peace-based dispensation for deceiving someone into believing you are a sincere negotiating partner when you are not.
True, insincere negotiators can extract valuable information – the counterpart’s pricing, priorities, and strategic alternatives – which can then be leveraged in future dealings. However, the ends do not justify the means and this is almost as bad as breaking into the competition’s computers to steal the valuable information referenced above.
Finally, insincere negotiations implicate the prohibition of Midvar Sheker Tirchak (Shemos 23:7) – distancing oneself from falsehood. The Chofetz Chaim rules in his Ahavas Chesed that this is an outright prohibition, and this view is normative Halachah. Gaining information through insincere negotiation makes the interaction dishonest and any benefit unfairly obtained.
not deliver, who says one thing on Tuesday and another thing on Thursday — will find that his rulings carry no weight because no one will listen, even if each individual ruling happens to be technically correct.
This lesson extends well beyond judges. Anyone in a position of influence — a rav, a teacher, a parent, a communal leader — derives their authority not merely from the correctness of their guidance but from whether people trust their word. A person can be right about everything and still be unable to influence or guide anyone if he is known to be unreliable in his personal commitments. Integrity is not just about telling the truth; it is about being true — consistent, dependable, and someone whose word and deed are one.
QUESTION: In the business world, it is not uncommon for individuals to utilize deceptive or insincere negotiating tactics. For example, a party may express a strong interest in securing "X" within an agreement, while their true objective is actually "Y." Such strategies are often employed to create leverage during negotiations. In certain cases, participants may enter into negotiations with no genuine intention of finalizing an agreement, but rather to gather pricing intelligence or delay the opposing party. May one employ these negotiating tactics?
ANSWER: It is strictly prohibited as there are several prohibitions that would forbid such practices.
The first prohibition is directly sourced in the Mishnah in Bava Metzia (4:10), which lists among the classic cases of Onaas Devarim (prohibition against causing another pain with words) the case of one who asks a shopkeeper “How much is this item?” when he has no intention of purchasing it. The Gemara (Bava Metzia 58b) explains that this causes the seller genuine pain – he invests hope, time, and effort into what he believes is a real transaction, only to discover it was hollow. This addresses insincere “buyers” who, for example, engage salespeople in protracted discussions, forcing the sincere party to invest time and resources in a negotiation that will never bear any fruit. The Shulchan Aruch codifies this prohibition (Choshen Mishpat 228:4), making it clear that it is not just rude to engage in such practices but an actual Halachic violation.
In addition to Onaas Devarim, insincere negotiations implicate the prohibition of Geneivas Da’as (deception) by creating a false impression in another person’s mind. The Gemara in Chullin (94a) cites Shmuel who says that this prohibition applies to Jew and Gentile, and the Baraisah there enumerates cases of forbidden deceptive conduct, such as repeatedly inviting someone to a meal knowing that he will refuse, solely to create a false impression of generosity. The insincere negotiator does something similar: he mimics the behaviors of a genuine counterpart – making proposals, exchanging concessions, and engaging in deliberation – all to create a false impression that he intends to reach a deal.
Notably, the Shaarei Teshuvah (3:181) states that the leniency of “Mutar L’Shanos Mipnei HaShalom” – that one may sometimes deviate from the truth for the sake of peace – does not apply to Geneivas Da’as. There is no peace-based dispensation for deceiving someone into believing you are a sincere negotiating partner when you are not.
True, insincere negotiators can extract valuable information – the counterpart’s pricing, priorities, and strategic alternatives – which can then be leveraged in future dealings. However, the ends do not justify the means and this is almost as bad as breaking into the competition’s computers to steal the valuable information referenced above.
Finally, insincere negotiations implicate the prohibition of Midvar Sheker Tirchak (Shemos 23:7) – distancing oneself from falsehood. The Chofetz Chaim rules in his Ahavas Chesed that this is an outright prohibition, and this view is normative Halachah. Gaining information through insincere negotiation makes the interaction dishonest and any benefit unfairly obtained.
“May I back out of a school carpool that I have already committed to?”
“Should I report a co-worker who is acting dishonestly?”
Call our Emes Halacha Hotline with your Everyday Emes questions at: 718-200-5462.
To subscribe to this weekly, free newsletter or for further information about our Foundation, please visit us at www.everydayemes.org or contact: [email protected].
