What happened eventually to that ‘conclusive’ demonstration for evolution? Along came Professor Westall in Oxford University and he gave it a kick in the belly; he proved that the whole pedigree of the horse is untrue. Every species in that collection that’s cited as one of the ancestors of modern horses is actually unrelated to the horse; not one of them was the ancestor of the other.
Which means the whole horse genealogy is bunkum! It was always a lie! The big boast of evolutionists, the proof that was cited by all the textbooks, the proof that all who are against creation rejoiced in – “At least the horse demonstrates gradual development!” – the whole thing was a big fat bluff.
Westall said this a long time ago, but now the evolutionist, Professor S. J. Gould, is saying it openly and it finally made it in the New York Times. Now, to get into the New York Times, it takes a long time for any truth to seep in there. And finally they had to admit it too; the one proof of slow and steady transformation is sheker.
